Reviews by stogdill 1948 and mann 1959 expressed skepticism regarding the trait theory of leadership and consequently the theory fell out of favor with many leadership researchers. However, research methods changed and as a result, stogdill came. Up until the early 1950s, it was really the only theory of leadership that was considered valid. Mann, 1959, many researchers discarded traitbased leadership. Contents preface to the third edition xi parti introduction to concepts. Important research into leadership traits, and among the first to challenge traditional traitbased theory, was the work conducted by ralph stogdill stogdill wrote a paper in 1948 personal factors associated with leadership. In his first survey, stogdill analyzed and synthesized more than 124 trait studies conducted between 1904 and 1947. What is the significance of ralf stogdills trait theory. Kendra cherry, ms, is an author, educational consultant, and speaker focused on helping students learn about psychology. For seventeen years and through two editions, this handbook has been the indispensable bible for every serious student of leadership.
Senior managers, for example, have become an increasing subject of inquiry. Stogdill s 1948 survey of 25 years of research, in which he concluded, a person does not become a leader by virtue of the possession of some combination of traits. In spite of the increased focus of researchers on trait theory, it remains among the more criticized theories of. This marked the end of researchers tenacious ideas that individual differences characterized leadership, or that theyd be able to predict leadership effectiveness. Analysis of trait, behaviour, and contingency theories md mahabubur rahman term paper business economics business management, corporate governance publish your bachelors or masters thesis, dissertation, term paper or essay. Leaders who are considered successful have a set of innate characteristics or qualities which have been developed by various 20oth century researchers. As a result, leadership research shifted away from traits the internal factor and towards behaviours the external expression of leadership. Assessing the trait theory of leadership using self and. Trait theories of leadership identify the specific personality traits that distinguish leaders from.
Stogdill, 1948 focused on the relationship between. He suggests that traits considered singly hold little diagnostic or predictive significance. Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaireform xii. Explain what stogdills work was and how it was different from his predecessors. Stogdill, 1963, and established the behavior paradigm of. That leadership depends upon having certain traits allows behavior modification to become more tenable in producing good leaders, if one takes to heart the writings of b.
Early in the 20th century, leaders were said to be powerful, taller, stronger, more intelligence and selfconfident. This target article gives critical consideration to the nature of the evidence supporting such a view as well as to more fundamental issues concerning the conceptual status of the trait concept. Stogdill, 1948 which emphasize leadership or popularity to the exclusion of other aspects of performance covered here have been useful. Summary chart of leadership perspectivestheoriesmodels. Since the publication of burnss 1978 seminal work on transforming. Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. Traits and skills theories as the nexus between leadership. Traits and skills theories as the nexus between leadership and expertise. Stogdill, 1948 prompted scholars to look beyond leader traits and. Effective leadership is one of the key factors in its growth, change and regeneration. Critiques of the leader trait paradigm jenkins, 1947. In the mid20th century, the trait approach was challenged by research that questioned the universality of leadership traits.
Stogdill, 1948 prompted scholars to look beyond leader traits and consider how leaders behaviors predicted effectiveness. This variety of research settings, together with a lack of theory linking leadership and leadership situations to prescribed leader characteristics, decreased. Scribd is the worlds largest social reading and publishing site. Similar to the great man theory, trait theory suggests that the characteristics or the personality of a person may make them an effective leader. Trait theory gives constructive information about leadership that is very complex. However, in 1948, a researcher called stogdill noticed that people who were leaders in one situation were not necessarily leaders in other situations, which rather destroyed trait theory, and situational and behavioural theories started to emerge. The trait approach to leadership is based on characteristics of individuals some successful and some unsuccessful. Ralph stogdill was one of the first to challenge traditional traitbased by a work he conducted in 1948. This followed much research during the previous two decades that had suggested the same. Chapter 2 presents the trait approach to studying leadership e. The trait approach emphasizes the personality of the leader.
In 1948, ralph melvin stogdill did a study that suggested leadership is based off of social situational interaction and not predefined traits cherry, 2016. Stogdill in his two surveys conducted between 1904 to 1947 and 1948 to 1970 identified certain traits that contribute towards an individual as heading the leadership process. Surveys of early trait research by stogdill 1948 and mann 1959 reported that many studies identified personality. Assessing the trait theory of leadership using self and observer ratings of personality.
Leadership is a kind of scarce resources and a determinable factor in an organization. An individual who was a leader in one situation might not have been a leader in another situation. Sometimes, obstacles in life present limitations that can only be brought out in certain situations like physical traits to be an effective leader, such as height and weight trait theory of leadership. Stogdill, 1948, mann, 1959, lord, devader, and alliger, 1986, kirkpatrick and locke, 1991, and. Many studies have been conducted to investigate the behavioral approach. Stogdills later work builds on his conclusions from the literature search, and he presents an interesting analysis of the trait theorists. Stogdills 1948 survey of 25 years of research, in which he concluded, a person does not become a leader by virtue of the possession of some combination of traits.
I am grateful to james scouller, an expert coach, thinker, and writer on leadership, for the contribution of most of the technical content on this article, and for the collaboration in editing it and presenting it here. The trait approach to leadership ha tried unsuccessfully to specify characteristics that differentiated effective from ineffective leader behavior. The evolution of leadership theory although the practice of leadership has changed considerably over time, the need for leaders and leadership has not bass, 1990a. Leadership is a focal area of research in the 21st century, as illustrated by fulmer and conger 2004 who claimed that there are well over 15,000 published articles and books available on.
Stogdill wrote a paper in 1948 personal factors associated with leadership. Trait theory explains leadership in terms of personality and character of the leader. Foundations of leadership summary chart of leadership perspectivestheoriesmodels v. The mediating role of contributions to group success. Chapter 1 provides a definition of leadership and brief discussions of differences between leadership and power, coercion, and management. That development, with its emphasis on the context in which the leader and followers functioned, and the demands it made for various quahties of leadership, was a counterweight to the long dominant leadertrait approach. Trait theorists are primarily interested in the measurement of traits, which can be defined as habitual patterns of behavior, thought, and emotion. The assumption that effective leaders differ in some identifiable and fundamental ways from other people is still a large part of mainstream io psychology. An individual with leadership traits who was a leader in one situation might not be a leader in another situation. Online shopping from a great selection at books store. Steven gans, md is boardcertified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at massachusetts general hospital. Manual dsm of the american psychiatric association.
Several academics believe that potential leaders can be spotted by studying the personality traits of the individual and matching them to the characteristics of actual leaders. No claim is made to completeness, but no sources of known relevance have been deliberately overlooked. Traditional leadership theories traits research stogdill. In his second study, he analyzed another 163 studies completed between 1948. They reasoned that if leaders possess superior qualities that differentiate them from followers, discovering these qualities should be possible hodgetts, 1993, p. Trait theories of leadership identify the specific personality traits that distinguish leaders from nonleaders. In psychology, trait theory also called dispositional theory is an approach to the study of human personality. Many current trait theorists suggest that a consensus is emerging around the big five as the basic structure of personality. Leadership has a long and controversial classic history so as of trait theories. The trait theory of leadership focuses on identifying different personality traits and.
Trait theory page psy 532 psychological foundations of. Already in 1990, bass 1990a found a proliferation of leadership books over 3, 300. Although stogdill did find some consistent relations, he concluded, the findings suggest that leadership is not a matter of passive status or of the mere possession of some combination of traits stogdill, 1948, p. It was reconceptualized as a relationship between people as opposed to a set of traits stogdill, 1948. This third edition reflects the growth and changes in the study of leadership since the 1981 edition. Stogdill scrutinized findings from over a hundred leadershiprelated studies and initiated 27 groups of factors traits to be possessed by an effective leader. Some of the first studies to be done were conducted at the ohio state university in the late 1940s, based on the findings of stogdills 1948 work, which pointed to the importance of considering more than leaders traits in leadership research. Bass the free press new york london toronto sydney singapore.
557 1136 1497 371 1151 183 875 399 194 1070 349 173 1172 79 1358 161 139 1445 1396 204 178 692 320 753 663 908 1340 407 1173 1311 391 675 1262 582 454 347 413 1243